{"id":1393,"date":"2026-02-15T06:16:23","date_gmt":"2026-02-15T06:16:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/"},"modified":"2026-02-15T06:16:23","modified_gmt":"2026-02-15T06:16:23","slug":"cqrs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/","title":{"rendered":"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n
Quick Definition (30\u201360 words)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) is a pattern that separates write operations from read operations, optimizing each side independently. Analogy: like having a kitchen for cooking and a pantry for serving, each tuned for its purpose. Formal: architectural pattern that splits commands and queries into distinct models and endpoints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
What is CQRS?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
CQRS is an architectural pattern that intentionally separates the responsibilities for handling commands (mutations, writes) and queries (reads). It is not just a synonym for microservices, event sourcing, or eventual consistency, though it is often paired with those patterns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
What it is:<\/li>\n
Separation of concerns for read and write workloads.<\/li>\n
Dedicated models and often separate data stores or projections for reads.<\/li>\n
\n
A design choice to optimize scalability, latency, and consistency tradeoffs.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
What it is NOT:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Not mandatory for every system; unnecessary complexity for simple CRUD apps.<\/li>\n
Not a persistence technology by itself.<\/li>\n
\n
Not always coupled with event sourcing; they are orthogonal patterns.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Key properties and constraints:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Logical separation of command and query endpoints.<\/li>\n
Potential eventual consistency between write model and read projections.<\/li>\n
Different scaling, caching, and security for reads vs writes.<\/li>\n
\n
Requires careful schema and API design to prevent duplication of business logic.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Where it fits in modern cloud\/SRE workflows:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Useful for high read\/write ratio systems in cloud-native environments.<\/li>\n
Aligns with Kubernetes operators, serverless functions, and managed event streams.<\/li>\n
\n
SRE concerns include consistency SLIs, reconciliation loops, operational automation, and incident playbooks for projection rebuilds.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Diagram description (text-only):<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Client issues a Command to Command API, Command API validates and writes to Command Store and emits Events to an Event Bus, Event Bus delivers to Projectors which transform Events into Read Models stored in Read Store, Query API serves read requests from Read Store, Telemetry and Observability collect metrics from both sides.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
CQRS in one sentence<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
CQRS separates write paths from read paths so each can be optimized independently, often using events to synchronize read projections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
CQRS vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n
ID<\/th>\n
Term<\/th>\n
How it differs from CQRS<\/th>\n
Common confusion<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\n
\n
T1<\/td>\n
Event Sourcing<\/td>\n
Stores state as events rather than state snapshots<\/td>\n
Often conflated as required companion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T2<\/td>\n
CRUD<\/td>\n
Single model handles reads and writes<\/td>\n
Assumed simpler but less scalable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T3<\/td>\n
Microservices<\/td>\n
Service decomposition by domain<\/td>\n
Not equivalent to separating read and write paths<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T4<\/td>\n
CQRS with ES<\/td>\n
CQRS pattern implemented with event sourcing<\/td>\n
Believed to be the only valid form<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T5<\/td>\n
Materialized View<\/td>\n
Read projection optimized for queries<\/td>\n
Mistaken for the command model<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T6<\/td>\n
Database Replication<\/td>\n
Copying data across nodes for HA<\/td>\n
Not a logical separation of responsibilities<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T7<\/td>\n
Data Mesh<\/td>\n
Domain-aligned data product approach<\/td>\n
Not focused on request path separation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T8<\/td>\n
SAGA<\/td>\n
Distributed transaction pattern<\/td>\n
Used for transaction consistency not read optimization<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T9<\/td>\n
Command Pattern<\/td>\n
Design pattern for encapsulating commands<\/td>\n
Programming pattern not full architecture<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
T10<\/td>\n
API Gateway<\/td>\n
Request routing layer<\/td>\n
May route commands and queries but not separate models<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Row Details (only if any cell says \u201cSee details below\u201d)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Not needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Why does CQRS matter?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
CQRS matters because it enables systems to scale and evolve with clearer tradeoffs between consistency, performance, and operational overhead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Business impact:<\/li>\n
Revenue: Faster reads and reliable writes can improve user experience and conversion.<\/li>\n
Trust: Clear separation reduces risk of read-side interference during heavy write load.<\/li>\n
\n
Risk: Complexity can increase time-to-market and operational risk if misapplied.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Engineering impact:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Incident reduction when read loads are isolated from writes.<\/li>\n
Increased development velocity for teams owning read projections.<\/li>\n
\n
Potential for duplication of logic requires discipline and testing.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
SRE framing:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
SLIs\/SLOs: separate SLIs for write latency, read latency, projection freshness, and event delivery success.<\/li>\n
Error budgets: split per surface; read-side errors may not imply write-side failures.<\/li>\n
Toil: projection rebuilds and schema migrations can cause significant operational work unless automated.<\/li>\n
\n
On-call: different on-call rotations or playbooks for read vs write incidents.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Realistic “what breaks in production” examples:\n 1. Projection lag: Events back up and read models become stale, causing users to see outdated data.\n 2. Event duplication: Consumer retries lead to duplicated read-side writes without idempotency.\n 3. Schema drift: Command model and read projections diverge after independent changes.\n 4. Event bus outage: Commands succeed but events are dropped, leaving read model inconsistent.\n 5. Hot read-key: A single popular read query overloads projection store leading to throttling.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Where is CQRS used? (TABLE REQUIRED)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n
ID<\/th>\n
Layer\/Area<\/th>\n
How CQRS appears<\/th>\n
Typical telemetry<\/th>\n
Common tools<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\n
\n
L1<\/td>\n
Edge and API<\/td>\n
Separate endpoints for commands and queries<\/td>\n
Request rates latencies errors<\/td>\n
API gateway service mesh<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
L2<\/td>\n
Service\/Application<\/td>\n
Command handlers and query handlers<\/td>\n
Handler durations error counts<\/td>\n
Frameworks and SDKs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
L3<\/td>\n
Data layer<\/td>\n
Command store and read store separation<\/td>\n
Replication lag projection age<\/td>\n
SQL NoSQL caches<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
L4<\/td>\n
Eventing<\/td>\n
Event bus between models<\/td>\n
Delivery success consumer lag<\/td>\n
Event buses message queues<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
L5<\/td>\n
Cloud infra<\/td>\n
Separate scaling profiles for read and write<\/td>\n
Autoscale events cost metrics<\/td>\n
Kubernetes serverless autoscaler<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
L6<\/td>\n
CI CD<\/td>\n
Independent deployment of projections<\/td>\n
Deployment failure rates<\/td>\n
Pipelines operators IaC<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
L7<\/td>\n
Observability<\/td>\n
SLIs for freshness and throughput<\/td>\n
Latency traces errors<\/td>\n
APM logging metrics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
L8<\/td>\n
Security<\/td>\n
Role based access for commands vs queries<\/td>\n
Unauthorized attempts audit logs<\/td>\n
IAM WAF encryption<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Row Details (only if needed)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Not needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
When should you use CQRS?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Deciding when to use CQRS depends on load, domain complexity, team maturity, and operational capacity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
When it\u2019s necessary:<\/li>\n
High read\/write disparity that benefits from different scaling.<\/li>\n
Write-side workflows that must remain stable under heavy read load.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
When it\u2019s optional:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Medium complexity systems where projection overhead is manageable.<\/li>\n
\n
Teams needing separation for autonomy but able to maintain duplication.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
When NOT to use \/ overuse it:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Simple CRUD apps with low load.<\/li>\n
Early-stage products where speed of development outweighs optimization.<\/li>\n
\n
Small teams lacking capacity for projection maintenance.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Decision checklist:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
If you have complex queries and need low latency -> consider CQRS.<\/li>\n
If you have a single team and small user base -> avoid CQRS.<\/li>\n
If event-driven workflows are core -> CQRS favored.<\/li>\n
\n
If consistency is strict and latency for reads must reflect writes immediately -> avoid or design for synchronous read model updates.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Maturity ladder:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Beginner: Separate endpoints in same service, single datastore, lightweight projections.<\/li>\n
Intermediate: Separate services, asynchronous events, materialized views, basic automation.<\/li>\n
Advanced: Event sourcing, multiple read stores per use case, automated projection rebuilds, cross-region replication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
How does CQRS work?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
CQRS divides the system into components that handle commands and queries separately. These components coordinate via events or other synchronization mechanisms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Components and workflow:<\/li>\n
Command API: accepts intent, validates, applies business rules.<\/li>\n
Command Handler: executes mutations against command store; may emit domain events.<\/li>\n
Event Bus: durable stream transporting events to consumers.<\/li>\n
Projectors\/Handlers: consume events and update read models.<\/li>\n
Read API: serves queries against optimized read stores.<\/li>\n
Reconciliation Jobs: repair projections when inconsistencies occur.<\/li>\n
\n
Observability: metrics, traces, logs monitoring both flows.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Data flow and lifecycle:\n 1. Client sends command to Command API.\n 2. Command Handler writes to Command Store, maybe producing domain events.\n 3. Event Bus stores event, marks them for delivery.\n 4. Projectors consume events and update Read Store(s).\n 5. Clients query Read API which reads from Read Store.\n 6. If projection errors occur, alerts trigger rebuild or replay jobs.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Edge cases and failure modes:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Lost events due to misconfiguration.<\/li>\n
Long tail consumer lag under load.<\/li>\n
Read model schema incompatible after migration.<\/li>\n
Exactly-once semantics often hard; idempotency required.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Typical architecture patterns for CQRS<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Simple CQRS in one service: both command and query handlers in same codebase, single DB, basic projections. Use when team small and low load.<\/li>\n
Distributed CQRS with async events: separate services, durable event bus, independent scaling. Use for medium-large systems with distinct read patterns.<\/li>\n
CQRS + Event Sourcing: write model is event store; projections rebuild from event history. Use for auditability and complex business logic that benefits from event history.<\/li>\n
CQRS with Materialized Views per use case: multiple read stores optimized for different queries. Use for high-performance read needs.<\/li>\n
Hybrid synchronous CQRS: some queries read from command store synchronously for strong consistency, others from projections. Use when mixed consistency needs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Cost per throughput<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Row Details (only if needed)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Not needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for CQRS<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
A glossary of 40+ terms with a brief definition, why it matters, and a common pitfall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Aggregate \u2014 Domain consistency boundary grouping related entities \u2014 Enforces invariants \u2014 Pitfall: making aggregates too large.<\/li>\n
Aggregate Root \u2014 Primary entity for an aggregate \u2014 Entry point for commands \u2014 Pitfall: bypassing root leads to invariants break.<\/li>\n
Anti Corruption Layer \u2014 Adapter for integrating legacy systems \u2014 Protects domain model \u2014 Pitfall: becomes an all-purpose translator.<\/li>\n
Append Only Log \u2014 Event storage that never mutates past entries \u2014 Enables replay \u2014 Pitfall: unmanaged size growth.<\/li>\n
Backpressure \u2014 Flow control to prevent overload \u2014 Protects consumers \u2014 Pitfall: improperly propagated to clients.<\/li>\n
Bounded Context \u2014 Domain model boundary in DDD \u2014 Clarifies semantics \u2014 Pitfall: ambiguous boundaries cause overlap.<\/li>\n
Command \u2014 Intent to change state \u2014 Triggers write path \u2014 Pitfall: making queries behave like commands.<\/li>\n
Command Handler \u2014 Processes commands and enforces invariants \u2014 Central to write behavior \u2014 Pitfall: mixed responsibilities with query logic.<\/li>\n
Command Store \u2014 Persistence for commands or state mutations \u2014 Durable writes \u2014 Pitfall: using same store for heavy reads.<\/li>\n
Event \u2014 Fact describing something that happened \u2014 Basis for projections \u2014 Pitfall: ambiguous event names.<\/li>\n
Event Bus \u2014 Transport for events between components \u2014 Enables decoupling \u2014 Pitfall: lack of durability config.<\/li>\n
Event Sourcing \u2014 Persist state as a sequence of events \u2014 Great for auditability \u2014 Pitfall: event schema migrations are hard.<\/li>\n
Eventual Consistency \u2014 Read model may lag after writes \u2014 Acceptable in many apps \u2014 Pitfall: not surfaced to users.<\/li>\n
Idempotency \u2014 Ability to apply an operation multiple times safely \u2014 Prevent duplicates \u2014 Pitfall: missing tokens or dedupe logic.<\/li>\n
Materialized View \u2014 Denormalized read model optimized for queries \u2014 Fast reads \u2014 Pitfall: stale data unless managed.<\/li>\n
Message Queue \u2014 Durable message transport \u2014 Smooths bursts \u2014 Pitfall: single point of failure if not managed.<\/li>\n
Optimistic Concurrency \u2014 Detects conflicts using versions \u2014 Scales well for reads \u2014 Pitfall: high conflict rates cause retries.<\/li>\n
Projection \u2014 Component that turns events into read models \u2014 Keeps queries fast \u2014 Pitfall: projection logic duplication.<\/li>\n
Read Model \u2014 Data optimized for queries and latency \u2014 Improves read performance \u2014 Pitfall: divergence from canonical model.<\/li>\n
Read Side \u2014 Serving queries path of the system \u2014 Tuned for performance \u2014 Pitfall: complex joins slow down reads.<\/li>\n
Replay \u2014 Reprocessing events to rebuild projections \u2014 Used for recovery \u2014 Pitfall: needs migration tooling.<\/li>\n
Use burn-rate alerting for SLOs with error budgets; page if burn rate exceeds 14x for short windows or 2x for longer windows depending on SLO criticality.<\/li>\n
Noise reduction tactics:<\/li>\n
Deduplicate similar alerts at source.<\/li>\n
Group alerts by root cause or service owner.<\/li>\n
Suppress noisy maintenance windows and apply dynamic thresholds.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
A concise implementation roadmap for adopting CQRS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1) Prerequisites\n – Clear domain boundaries and APIs.\n – Event bus or messaging infrastructure.\n – Observability and deployment pipelines.\n – Team agreement on ownership and SLA targets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2) Instrumentation plan\n – Instrument commands queries projections with metrics.\n – Add tracing across services and through events.\n – Record projection timestamps and event offsets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
3) Data collection\n – Collect metrics logs traces DLQ events and cost data.\n – Centralize telemetry with retention policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
4) SLO design\n – Define SLOs for read latency write latency projection freshness and event delivery.\n – Allocate error budgets per service surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
5) Dashboards\n – Build executive on-call and debug dashboards as above.\n – Add historical trend panels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
6) Alerts & routing\n – Define actionable alerts and routing to the right on-call team.\n – Use automated escalation for critical SLO breaches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
7) Runbooks & automation\n – Create runbooks for projection rebuilds consumer scaling and DLQ handling.\n – Automate replay jobs and snapshotting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
8) Validation (load\/chaos\/game days)\n – Run load tests for producer bursts consumer lag scenarios.\n – Execute chaos experiments on event bus and projection failures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
9) Continuous improvement\n – Review postmortems and tune autoscaling.\n – Periodically test rebuild path and migrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Checklists<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Pre-production checklist<\/li>\n
Domain boundaries defined and modeled.<\/li>\n
Event schema agreed and versioning plan.<\/li>\n
Observability instrumented for commands queries projections.<\/li>\n
Automated CI for projection tests.<\/li>\n
\n
Backup and replay mechanisms tested.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Production readiness checklist<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
SLOs and alerts configured.<\/li>\n
On-call runbooks validated.<\/li>\n
Autoscaling policies set for consumers.<\/li>\n
DLQ handling process in place.<\/li>\n
\n
Cost guardrails applied.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Incident checklist specific to CQRS<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Identify whether issue is write read or event pipeline.<\/li>\n
Check event bus health and consumer lags.<\/li>\n
Inspect DLQ and recent errors.<\/li>\n
If needed, trigger projection replay with guardrails.<\/li>\n
Notify stakeholders and update incident timeline.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Use Cases of CQRS<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
8\u201312 practical use cases with context, problem, why CQRS helps, what to measure, typical tools.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1) High-performance e-commerce catalog\n– Context: Millions of product views and fewer updates.\n– Problem: Read queries with complex filters slow down writes.\n– Why CQRS helps: Materialized views for popular query patterns reduce read latency.\n– What to measure: Read latency p95 projection lag cache hit rate.\n– Typical tools: Elasticsearch Kafka Redis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2) Financial ledger with audit trail\n– Context: Transactions must be auditable and replayable.\n– Problem: Need immutable history and fast query by account.\n– Why CQRS helps: Event sourcing preserves history while projections enable fast account views.\n– What to measure: Event integrity replay time command latency.\n– Typical tools: Event store PostgreSQL snapshots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
3) Social feed generation\n– Context: High fan-out writes and personalized reads.\n– Problem: Generating feeds at query time is expensive.\n– Why CQRS helps: Precomputed feed projections per user improve latency.\n– What to measure: Projection freshness feed serve latency memory usage.\n– Typical tools: Kafka Redis Cassandra.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
4) IoT device telemetry\n– Context: Many sensors sending events, dashboards query recent state.\n– Problem: Aggregation queries slow when stored raw.\n– Why CQRS helps: Stream processors produce aggregated read models.\n– What to measure: Event throughput consumer lag aggregation latency.\n– Typical tools: Managed streaming serverless functions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
5) Booking and inventory systems\n– Context: Concurrent bookings with availability queries.\n– Problem: Reads can interfere with locking or contention.\n– Why CQRS helps: Separate write model ensures invariant enforcement; read models for availability queries.\n– What to measure: Conflicts per minute projection lag booking latency.\n– Typical tools: Optimistic concurrency DB message bus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
6) Fraud detection pipelines\n– Context: Need real-time decisions and historical patterns.\n– Problem: Heavy analytical queries slow operational systems.\n– Why CQRS helps: Operational read models for decisions and analytic stores for training.\n– What to measure: Decision latency detection accuracy event delivery.\n– Typical tools: Stream processors ML feature store.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
7) Content management with preview\n– Context: Authors update content; users need fast reads.\n– Problem: Publishing pipeline delays visible content.\n– Why CQRS helps: Separate publish commands and fast read removal for live site.\n– What to measure: Publish latency cache invalidation time read errors.\n– Typical tools: CDN cache materialized views.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
8) Multi-region reads with local latency\n– Context: Global users require low-latency reads.\n– Problem: Single write store increases read latency and risk.\n– Why CQRS helps: Read replicas or projections per region synchronized via events.\n– What to measure: Inter-region replication lag read latency by region.\n– Typical tools: Regionally replicated event buses CDN caches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Scenario #1 \u2014 Kubernetes microservices with CQRS<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Context:<\/strong> Online marketplace deployed on Kubernetes with high read traffic.\nGoal:<\/strong> Reduce read latency and isolate write load.\nWhy CQRS matters here:<\/strong> Kubernetes offers independent scaling for read and write services. CQRS allows scaling query pods without impacting command throughput.\nArchitecture \/ workflow:<\/strong> Command API service writes to PostgreSQL and publishes events to Kafka. Projection workers consume Kafka update Redis and Elasticsearch read stores. Query API serves reads from Redis and Elasticsearch.\nStep-by-step implementation:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Define commands and events.<\/li>\n
Implement command service and event publisher with transactional outbox.<\/li>\n
Deploy Kafka and configure partitions.<\/li>\n
Build projection workers in separate deployments.<\/li>\n
Expose Query API with autoscaling based on read latency.<\/li>\n
Configure Prometheus metrics for projection lag.\nWhat to measure:<\/strong> Projection lag consumer lag query latency command latency error rates.\nTools to use and why:<\/strong> Kubernetes Prometheus Grafana Kafka Redis Elasticsearch; Kubernetes for scaling and isolation.\nCommon pitfalls:<\/strong> Hot partitions in Kafka; Redis cache invalidation errors; projection schema drift.\nValidation:<\/strong> Load test with synthetic read and write patterns and measure lag under peak.\nOutcome:<\/strong> Read latency reduced 70% in p95 while write throughput maintained.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
Context:<\/strong> SaaS analytics product on serverless platform.\nGoal:<\/strong> Fast dashboards with minimal ops overhead.\nWhy CQRS matters here:<\/strong> Serverless allows event-driven projection workers without managing servers, ideal for varying workloads.\nArchitecture \/ workflow:<\/strong> HTTP Command endpoint triggers function writing to managed DB and pushing event to managed streaming service. Projection functions subscribed to stream update managed NoSQL read store. Query API served via API gateway reads from NoSQL.\nStep-by-step implementation:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Design event contracts and function triggers.<\/li>\n
Implement transactional outbox or atomic write pattern.<\/li>\n
Deploy functions and configure managed stream subscriptions.<\/li>\n
Create monitoring with cloud metrics and logs.\nWhat to measure:<\/strong> Function invocation latency projection lag stream error rate.\nTools to use and why:<\/strong> Managed streaming serverless functions managed NoSQL cloud monitoring; low ops.\nCommon pitfalls:<\/strong> Cold-starts increasing latency; limited visibility into underlying infra.\nValidation:<\/strong> Execute load test with bursty events and validate autoscaling and DLQ behavior.\nOutcome:<\/strong> Low operational overhead with acceptable eventual consistency for dashboards.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
Context:<\/strong> Production incident where read model was stale after a deployment.\nGoal:<\/strong> Restore correctness and improve processes.\nWhy CQRS matters here:<\/strong> Rebuilding projections is an operational task that must be reliable and documented.\nArchitecture \/ workflow:<\/strong> Events stored in event store; projection job failed with schema error during deployment.\nStep-by-step implementation:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Pause incoming commands if needed.<\/li>\n
Fix projection code or add migration step.<\/li>\n
Replay events into new projection with throttling.<\/li>\n
Validate read model integrity against spot checks.<\/li>\n
Resume normal operations.\nWhat to measure:<\/strong> Replay error rates projection rebuild time divergence checks.\nTools to use and why:<\/strong> Event store replay tooling logs APM for tracing.\nCommon pitfalls:<\/strong> Missing migration scripts causing repeated failures.\nValidation:<\/strong> Postmortem with RCA link to code and deployment process updates.\nOutcome:<\/strong> Process improvements and automation to prevent regression.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
Scenario #4 \u2014 Cost vs performance trade-off scenario<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Context:<\/strong> Growing social app facing rising costs from projections per user.\nGoal:<\/strong> Reduce cost while maintaining acceptable latency.\nWhy CQRS matters here:<\/strong> Multiple read models per user increased storage and compute.\nArchitecture \/ workflow:<\/strong> Per-user materialized views in NoSQL updated on every event.\nStep-by-step implementation:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Analyze access patterns to identify cold users.<\/li>\n
Tier projections: hot users have full projection, cold users generate on demand.<\/li>\n
Introduce caching and TTL for cold projections.<\/li>\n
Monitor savings and latency impact.\nWhat to measure:<\/strong> Cost per user read latency cache hit rate projection rebuild frequency.\nTools to use and why:<\/strong> Cost monitoring cloud metrics caching layer analytics.\nCommon pitfalls:<\/strong> Added complexity for on demand building leading to occasional spikes.\nValidation:<\/strong> A\/B test new tiered projection approach.\nOutcome:<\/strong> 45% cost reduction with acceptable latency tradeoffs.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
15\u201325 mistakes with symptom, root cause, fix. Include 5 observability pitfalls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Symptom: Read data stale for minutes. Root cause: Projection lag due to single consumer. Fix: Autoscale consumers tune backpressure.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Duplicate entries after retry. Root cause: Non idempotent projector. Fix: Implement idempotency keys.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Event loss during failover. Root cause: Non durable event bus or misconfigured retention. Fix: Use durable store configure replication.<\/li>\n
Symptom: High p99 read latency. Root cause: Unoptimized read model joins. Fix: Create denormalized materialized view.<\/li>\n
Symptom: On-call confusion over which team to page. Root cause: Ownership not defined per surface. Fix: Define SLOs and clear ownership.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Alert storms during deployment. Root cause: No suppression for rollouts. Fix: Add deployment windows and suppression rules.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Cost unexpectedly high. Root cause: Projections duplicated per region. Fix: Consolidate projections and use cache TTL.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Transactions blocking under load. Root cause: Single monolithic write model. Fix: Split aggregates optimize transactions.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Consumer lag spikes. Root cause: Hot partition in event bus. Fix: Repartition topic or shard differently.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Trace gaps across event bus. Root cause: Trace id not propagated in events. Fix: Embed trace context in event metadata.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Missing metrics for projection failures. Root cause: No instrumentation on projectors. Fix: Add metrics and alerts.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Slow replay time. Root cause: No snapshots for event store. Fix: Implement periodic snapshots.<\/li>\n
Symptom: DLQ growth unnoticed. Root cause: No DLQ alerting. Fix: Add DLQ size alert and remediation runbook.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Read model and write model logic mismatch. Root cause: Duplicate business logic inconsistent tests. Fix: Consolidate validation into reusable libraries.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Security breach via write API. Root cause: Overpermissive roles. Fix: Enforce RBAC least privilege and auditing.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Traces show large fan-out cost. Root cause: Projection per customer leading to many updates. Fix: Use aggregated projection strategy.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Observability high-cardinality metric explosion. Root cause: Tagging by unbounded IDs. Fix: Use aggregations and lower-cardinality labels.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Alerts trigger for transient spikes. Root cause: Low threshold or no dedupe. Fix: Use rolling windows and rate-based alerts.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Developers afraid to change events. Root cause: No versioning policy. Fix: Document event evolution and backward compatibility.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Missing service level reporting. Root cause: No SLOs for projection freshness. Fix: Define SLOs instrument and report.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Playbook outdated during incidents. Root cause: No postmortem updates. Fix: Update runbooks after every major incident.<\/li>\n
Symptom: High toil for manual replays. Root cause: No automation for replay. Fix: Provide automated replay jobs with guardrails.<\/li>\n
Symptom: GDPR requests difficult. Root cause: Event store retains personal data in events. Fix: Implement redaction and legal-approved erasure flows.<\/li>\n
Symptom: Slow debugging due to dispersed logs. Root cause: No correlation ids across events. Fix: Add correlation ids propagate through events.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Best Practices & Operating Model<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Operational guidance for reliable CQRS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Ownership and on-call:<\/li>\n
Assign owners per command and per projection.<\/li>\n
Separate on-call roles for write and read surfaces if scale warrants.<\/li>\n
\n
SLO-based paging to reduce noise.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Runbooks vs playbooks:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Runbooks: step-by-step automated procedures for common incidents (replay projection, restart consumer).<\/li>\n
Playbooks: high-level incident coordination and communications templates.<\/li>\n
\n
Keep both versioned and discoverable.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Safe deployments:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Canary deployments for projection code changes.<\/li>\n
Rollback and feature flag capability for event schema changes.<\/li>\n
\n
Blue-green for critical projections.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Toil reduction and automation:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Automate projection rebuild with throttling and snapshot usage.<\/li>\n
Auto-heal consumers on transient errors with exponential backoff.<\/li>\n
\n
Periodic cleanup of DLQs and compaction tasks.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Security basics:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Enforce least privilege for command APIs.<\/li>\n
Audit event publishing and consumer access.<\/li>\n
\n
Encrypt events at rest and in transit; redact PII in events.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n
Weekly\/monthly routines:<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
Weekly: Review consumer lag, DLQ items, and top error types.<\/li>\n
Monthly: Cost review projection cost and optimization opportunities.<\/li>\n
Include projection rebuild pipelines<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
I9<\/td>\n
DLQ Management<\/td>\n
Capture undeliverable events<\/td>\n
Alerting replay tools<\/td>\n
Monitor size and age metrics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
I10<\/td>\n
Cost Monitoring<\/td>\n
Track cost of projections and traffic<\/td>\n
Billing alerting tags<\/td>\n
Tie cost to team owners<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Row Details (only if needed)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Not needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Q1: Is CQRS the same as microservices?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
No. CQRS separates read and write responsibilities and can exist within a microservice or across services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q2: Do I always need event sourcing with CQRS?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
No. Event sourcing is optional and provides benefits for audit and replay but adds complexity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q3: How do I handle eventual consistency for users?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Surface consistency expectations in the UI use version tokens or optimistic UI updates and provide eventual consistency indicators when needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q4: How do I make projections idempotent?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Include event ids or sequence numbers and store last applied id to avoid double application.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q5: What if projection rebuilds take too long?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Use snapshots partitioned rebuilds throttling and incremental replay to reduce rebuild time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q6: How to test CQRS systems?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Unit test command and projector logic integration tests for event flows end to end replay tests and chaos experiments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q7: How to monitor projection freshness?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Instrument event timestamps and last applied timestamps compute projection lag SLI and alert on breaches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q8: How to manage event schema changes?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Version events add compatibility code and plan migration replay tests and feature flags.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q9: Can CQRS reduce costs?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Yes through optimized read stores and caching but it can increase costs if projections multiply storage or compute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q10: Who owns projections?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Typically the team that serves the read use case owns the projection lifetime and SLAs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q11: How to secure the event bus?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Use IAM encryption and access controls audit logs and network isolation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q12: Are transactions across commands and events possible?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Use transactional outbox patterns or two phase commit though the latter impacts performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q13: When to use synchronous read updates?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
When strict consistency required for certain critical reads; keep limited surface area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q14: What is the best event bus for CQRS?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Varies \/ depends on throughput latency and operational constraints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q15: How to prevent hot keys in projections?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Shard data use caches and move to per-user or per-entity caching strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q16: How to handle GDPR erasure in event stores?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Design event redaction legal-approved erasure flows and avoid storing raw PII in events.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q17: How do I measure success?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Track SLIs SLOs error budgets projection lag and user experience metrics like conversion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Q18: What are common scaling levers?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Autoscale consumers use partitioning and add read replicas or caching layers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
CQRS is a pragmatic pattern for separating command and query responsibilities to optimize for scale, performance, and domain clarity. It shines when read and write workloads diverge, when auditability matters, or when read performance needs specialized optimizations. It introduces operational overhead that must be managed through observability automation and clear ownership.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Next 7 days plan (5 bullets)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Day 1: Map domain boundaries and identify candidate read models.<\/li>\n
Day 2: Instrument a proof-of-concept command and projection with metrics and traces.<\/li>\n
Day 3: Deploy event transport and implement transactional outbox.<\/li>\n
Day 4: Build basic dashboards for projection lag and latencies.<\/li>\n
Day 5: Run small-scale load test and validate projection correctness.<\/li>\n
Day 6: Write runbooks for projection rebuild and DLQ handling.<\/li>\n
Day 7: Review SLOs finalize ownership and schedule a game day.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide) - NoOps School<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide) - NoOps School\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"---\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"NoOps School\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-15T06:16:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rajeshkumar\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rajeshkumar\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"29 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"rajeshkumar\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/594df1987b48355fda10c34de41053a6\"},\"headline\":\"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide)\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-15T06:16:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/\"},\"wordCount\":5730,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"What is Series\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/\",\"name\":\"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide) - NoOps School\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-15T06:16:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/594df1987b48355fda10c34de41053a6\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"NoOps School\",\"description\":\"NoOps Certifications\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/594df1987b48355fda10c34de41053a6\",\"name\":\"rajeshkumar\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/787e4927bf816b550f1dea2682554cf787002e61c81a79a6803a804a6dd37d9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/787e4927bf816b550f1dea2682554cf787002e61c81a79a6803a804a6dd37d9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"rajeshkumar\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/author\/rajeshkumar\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide) - NoOps School","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide) - NoOps School","og_description":"---","og_url":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/","og_site_name":"NoOps School","article_published_time":"2026-02-15T06:16:23+00:00","author":"rajeshkumar","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rajeshkumar","Est. reading time":"29 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/"},"author":{"name":"rajeshkumar","@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/594df1987b48355fda10c34de41053a6"},"headline":"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide)","datePublished":"2026-02-15T06:16:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/"},"wordCount":5730,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["What is Series"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/","url":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/","name":"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide) - NoOps School","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-02-15T06:16:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/594df1987b48355fda10c34de41053a6"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/cqrs\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What is CQRS? Meaning, Architecture, Examples, Use Cases, and How to Measure It (2026 Guide)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/","name":"NoOps School","description":"NoOps Certifications","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/594df1987b48355fda10c34de41053a6","name":"rajeshkumar","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/787e4927bf816b550f1dea2682554cf787002e61c81a79a6803a804a6dd37d9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/787e4927bf816b550f1dea2682554cf787002e61c81a79a6803a804a6dd37d9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rajeshkumar"},"url":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/author\/rajeshkumar\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1393\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/noopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}